Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mark Whitehouse vs Alexis Canter Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Whitehouse vs Canter analysis and find out who is favored!
Mark Whitehouse vs Alexis Canter Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Whitehouse 2 - 0 Canter
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Whitehouse has won 45.94% of points on their second serve, while Canter has won 53.87%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Whitehouse, in recent form, has won 48.02% of their opponent's second serve points, while Canter has won 47.83%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.14% and 28.36% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Whitehouse has saved 59.57% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Canter has saved 60.32% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Whitehouse has won 41.18% of matches played (W/L 14/ 20), with Canter winning 47.06% (W/L 16/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Whitehouse has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 51% (W/L 40/ 39), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 14/ 17). Canter has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 132/ 110), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 4/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Whitehouse has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 41.67% of matches (W/L 10/ 14), where as Canter has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 48.48% of matches (W/L 16/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Whitehouse winning 2 times and Canter being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Whitehouse winning 4 and Canter winning 1. The last match between Whitehouse and Canter was at the M15 Parnu, 03-11-2020, First, I.hard with Mark Whitehouse getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:28:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Whitehouse and Canter have played a deciding set 1 times, with Whitehouse winning 1 times and Canter 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Whitehouse winning 1, and Canter 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Whitehouse has played against opponents with an average rank of 292.38 while Canter has played against players with an average rank of 86.56.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Whitehouse has won 31% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Canter has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Whitehouse has converted 33.8% of breakpoint opportunities, and Canter has converted 62.07% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
894
Rank
523
High
31
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
886
Rank
773
High
26
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
50% (182-182)
Career Total W/L
51% (186-177)
43% (6-8)
YTD W/L
56% (9-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Mark Whitehouse vs Alexis Canter For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Whitehouse VS Canter
Sportsbook
Offer
Whitehouse VS Canter H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Mark Whitehouse | Alexis Canter |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 29 | 23 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:28:0 | 1:28:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (80/116) | 55% (63/115) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 66% (53/80) | 67% (42/63) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (16/36) | 44% (23/52) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (5/15) | 56% (5/9) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (50/115) | 41% (47/116) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
Whitehouse VS Canter H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Mark Whitehouse
Player
Alexis Canter
100%
(
8 of
8)
1st Serve %
75%
(
6 of
8)
2
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
75%
(
6 of
8)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
9
Total Points Won
7
|
||||
| 4-6 7-6(4) 6-3 |
Stats
Mark Whitehouse
Player
Alexis Canter
67%
(
72 of
108)
1st Serve %
53%
(
57 of
107)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
45 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
107)
110
Total Points Won
105
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mark Whitehouse | Alexis Canter |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 43% (6/8) | 56% (9/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 45% (14/17) | 57% (20/15) |
| Games Win/Loss | 46% (138/161) | 53% (191/172) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 67% (4/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (4/4) | 50% (5/5) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.71 | 0.39 |
| Aces Total | 104 | 68 |
| DFs per game | 0.3 | 0.06 |
| DFs Total | 44 | 11 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:27:27 | 1:23:53 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 141.36 | 67.38 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (606/963) | 66% (609/919) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (431/606) | 72% (440/609) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (164/357) | 54% (167/310) |
| BPs Won% Total | 34% (24/71) | 62% (36/58) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (322/914) | 36% (306/858) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 46% (6/7) | 60% (9/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 38% (5/13) | 56% (9/16) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 83% (5/6) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 25% (1/4) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (8/6) | 82% (11/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (8/2) | 18% (11/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (6/0) | 0% (5/0) |
Mark Whitehouse Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Adam Heinonen
Player
Mark Whitehouse
68%
(
59 of
87)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
101)
6
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
5
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
51 of
101)
105
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mark Whitehouse
Player
Jelle Sels
50%
(
16 of
32)
1st Serve %
65%
(
22 of
34)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
81%
(
13 of
16)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
9 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
37
Total Points Won
29
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Carlos Gimeno Valero
Player
Mark Whitehouse
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mikalai Haliak
Player
Mark Whitehouse
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
50%
(
25 of
50)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anton Matusevich
Player
Mark Whitehouse
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
5
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
6
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
77%
(
17 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mark Whitehouse
Player
Andrin Casanova
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
43%
(
39 of
91)
10
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
4
86%
(
37 of
43)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
17 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Mark Whitehouse
67%
(
58 of
87)
1st Serve %
66%
(
74 of
112)
11
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
6
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
55 of
74)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
26 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
45 of
112)
106
Total Points Won
93
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mark Whitehouse
Player
Adam Panaras
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
100%
(
26 of
26)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
56
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Mark Whitehouse
Player
Hugo Pierre
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
9 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Mark Whitehouse
57%
(
47 of
82)
1st Serve %
72%
(
54 of
75)
16
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Alexis Canter Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Alexis Canter
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexis Canter
Player
Harry Wendelken
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
7
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
20 of
52)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexis Canter
Player
Zechariah Hamrouni
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve %
69%
(
31 of
45)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
16 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexis Canter
Player
Sean Hodkin
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Toby Martin
Player
Alexis Canter
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
75%
(
49 of
65)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
59
Total Points Won
55
|
6-7(5) 6-4 12-10 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexis Canter
Player
James Beaven
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Alexis Canter
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
7
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
2
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexis Canter
Player
Carlo Alberto Fossati
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
8
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
24 of
28)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
16 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexis Canter
Player
Thomas Mathys
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Oscar Lacides
Player
Alexis Canter
45%
(
27 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Whitehouse Vs Canter Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Whitehouse are available here and Canter photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
